Triumph has rolled out two distinct variants of its Rocket 3 motorcycle: the R and the GT. At first glance, these models seem quite similar, but a deeper dive reveals key differences in handlebars, seat configuration, and foot control placement. While the GT includes a backrest as standard, you can easily retrofit the R with one from your Triumph dealer, making it possible to convert between the two variants to suit your preference.

When choosing between the R and the GT, my decision leaned towards the R primarily due to its mid-mounted foot controls, as I’m not a fan of forward-set pegs. However, after experiencing some back discomfort, I borrowed the GT’s default touring seat from my local dealer. The added comfort was undeniable, prompting me to make the switch. I’m confident many Rocket 3 enthusiasts face similar decisions, so I’ve penned this article for their benefit.

Comparison images show the touring seat on the left and the sport seat on the right. Notably, the touring seat extends longer for the rider, offering more room to shift positions, thereby reducing fatigue on long rides. On the contrary, the pillion touring seat is thicker but shorter than the sport variant.

Significantly, components of the sport and touring seats, including aluminum trims, are not interchangeable. A touring pillion seat won’t fit with a sport rider seat and vice versa.

For solo riding, Triumph offers a stylish pillion infill piece. However, you cannot mix and match between the sport and touring variants of these infills. Previous set of images illustrates the incompatibility of the touring pillion infill with the sport rider seat.

Conversely, the last three images showcase the seamless fit and enhanced aesthetic when pairing the touring rider seat with the touring pillion infill, complemented by the elegant metal Triumph plate for an even more refined appearance.

By understanding these nuanced differences, Rocket 3 riders can make informed choices tailored to their riding preferences.